In GreenHopper 6.1.2 for both Kanban and Scrum issues, the concept of blocked appears to be implemented as a value for priority ("Blocker"). This seems like a mismatch since something that was high priority before being blocked is probably still high priority, but to convey the message that it is blocked, I've got to give up it's actual priority and use that field to convey the state that it is in. When it becomes unblocked, I apparently need to dig through the change history of the issue to recall the actual priority -- clunky.
A better approach (in my opinion) would be to add a state for Blocked and slide the issue into that state while maintaining it's actual priority.
Badges are a great way to show off community activity, whether you’re a newbie or a Champion.Learn more
Trello is one of the most effective tools for driving your sprints. It's customizable for every Agile team and product owners and Scrum masters (SM) love it. However, Agile teams often struggle with:...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs