Following your examples I would like to hide the subtasks section if there is no subtask available.
What is the right approach for that?
Hi Florin,
I have found a strange workaround for this. I put the heading *inside* the "for" loop and then put a conditional around the heading section:
&{for issues|filter=%{'${IssueTypeName}'.equals('New Feature') && '${FixVersions}'.equals('4.1.0')}}
#{if (%{${BulkIssueIndex} == 0})}
NEW FEATURES |
#{end}
${Key} |
${Summary} |
&{end}
This is an actual excerpt from a template I use to generate a "road map".
Hope this helps.
Mark
Hi Florin,
in my tests I am using a notation like the following together with a filter only on standard issue types (no sub-tasks):
&{for issues} ${Key} ${Summary} ${Description} #{for subtasks} ${Subtasks[n].Key} ${Subtasks[n].Summary} #{end} &{end}
In the resulting report the subtasks section is empty for all issues without subtasks!
Hope that solves your problem!
Regards
Norbert
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Norbert, yes your approach works if you do not use any headings for the subtask information. What I ment is how I actually hide the headings for empty tables.
Thank you!
Florin
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Florin,
We are sorry it is not currently possible to hide sections of a document according to the value of a field.
We have that feature in roadmap, but it does not have a scheduled version right now.
Best Regards
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.