Is there a way to bind boards ?

Hi community,
I was wondering if there was a way to "bind" two boards.

I'm currently working with User Stories, each divided in several scenarios.
Each scenario is sub-divided in 3 Sub-tasks (always the same : conception, execution, and search of parameters).
I have a board (let's call it Story Board) that has the User Stories as Stories (JIRA type) and the Sub-tasks (JIRA type)

You could see these Sub-tasks as "global" sub-tasks that regroup the sub-tasks of each scenario of the story. For instance, US 12 has 4 scenarios. Then in the Story Board, we would have Story 12 and Sub-tasks Conception, Execution and Search. Conception regroups the conception sub-tasks of the 4 scenarios (in terms of time and points). Same thing for Execution and Search.

In this board, I don't see the scenarios, as this board is for a general view of the project.

I created a board (let's call it Scenario Board) in which I would have the User Stories as Epics (JIRA type), scenarios as Stories (JIRA type) and the sub-tasks as Sub-tasks (JIRA type). This board is here to have a more precise view of the project. Its usage would be only for the team.

So, what I'd like to do is getting the summaries of the Stories in the Sprint of Story Board, and create Epics in Scenario Board with theses summaries. Then I would "manually" create the scenarios (Stories), as there is not the same number of them between the different stories.
As for the sub-tasks, I'd like to create them automatically after a naming convention, as there are 3 for each and every scenario (and the are always the same, as mentionned before).

Are there add-ons that can help do such things ? And where can I find them ?

Thanks in advance.
Vincent

1 answer

0 vote

I'm afraid this approach simply won't work.  Take a step back and think it through:

You have an issue which represents a real-life thing that needs doing (e.g. "Build a new penguin pool").  That will naturally break down into "Conception - designing a pool", "Execution - building a pool" and "Search - finding some penguins".  So you've got a user story and three sub-tasks.

Now.  Boards are a view of a set of issues.  So, starting with your Scenario board, you select the project and see your Story and sub-tasks on it fine.

But then you contradict all of that with your "Epics" board.  The Stories are Stories, not Epics.  The boards are looking at the same issue.  It's an issue of type Story.  There's no "make it look like another type" option, and it would be confusing because people would be talking about the same things using different terms.

But, keep it simple.  Your "scenario board" is fine if you don't try the confusing renaming.  Imagine your Scenario board simply says "project = xyz".  Your story board can say "project = xyz and issuetype in standardissuetypes()".  You won't see the subtasks.

Also, as an aside, you won't see the sub-tasks in the planning view of either board, as they're useless for planning.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Join to answer
Community showcase
Sarah Schuster
Posted Jan 29, 2018 in Jira

What are common themes you've seen across successful & failed Jira Software implementations?

Hey everyone! My name is Sarah Schuster, and I'm a Customer Success Manager in Atlassian specializing in Jira Software Cloud. Over the next few weeks I will be posting discussion topics (8 total) to ...

3,264 views 14 20
Join discussion

Atlassian User Groups

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find a group

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find my local user group

Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.

Start an AUG

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs

Groups near you
Atlassian Team Tour

Join us on the Team Tour

We're bringing product updates and pro tips on teamwork to ten cities around the world.

Save your spot