I just upgraded to the latest greenhopper. This is my first version with the Epic support for rapid boards. I attempted to run the Classic Epi Migration tool, but it claimed everything was already ok. It says this,
GreenHopper requires a reindex (either a full reindex, or a completed background reindex) for epics and epics related functionality to work properly. Only issues reindexed after the "Epic Link" field has been added to the system will be valid candidates for migration.
Your work around worked because editing and issue also reindexes it.
I have the same issue as Mark. After a full re-index, it still shows
0 epic links will be migrated
But this issue only applies to projects where I already did some manual Epic-Issue-Association (I found out about the Classic Migration, after doing a little testing).
For projects, where I never touched an issue after updating GH, Classic Migration works as expected.
Only issues will be migrated for which no new epic-issue association already exists, the others will be ignored. This logic applies on a per-issue basis, not on a per-project basis though, so in your case I assume you manually linked up all issues (that have an Epic/Theme value) of some projects to their respective epics already?
I found a work around for this. Apparently, the migration is only migrating issues the have been changed in some way after the upgrade to the latest green hopper. So, what I did was used bulk change to add a label to every issue that had an non-empty Epic field. I limited the JQL to a single project and the latest version for now. My JQL looked something like this.
project = XL and fixVersion = Jun13 and Epic is not empty
On the bulk change, I added an arbitrary label, named "hasEpic".
After I did this, when I ran the Epic Migration tool, it updated all the epics that I just added that label to.
Prior to doing this, I manually entered names for these epics from the planning board since they all said, "Unlabelled" For some reason, that was not done automatically.
Also, a word of caution. I have no idea how bulk change handles labels. Does it replace all of them, meaning if one of these issues already had a label for something else would it remove that label, or will it just add the label I added. Since my items didn't have labels, I'm not sure. If your items have labels, you may want to check this on one or two first to determine if it will be a problem. Or you can change another field. I tried changing stuff that didn't require changining like in my case, fixVersion = Jun13, but that basically resulted in no change and didn't help making the migration tool work.
Introduction This article will give insight on how a small software development department implemented Atlassian products to enhance and streamline the business process. The privately held company h...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs