A little bit of background - I am working with an emerging Agile team that is working in a majority waterfall environment. So this can be tricky...
One thing that will help us fit in to all of this, is having "two states (statuses) of closed".
Meaning, that our Agile team can work within a Scrum board, complete their Sprints and close all issues in their sprint.
Once those issues are closed, our Sprint Metrics (reporting) are recorded for the Agile team - then another waterfall team can pick those "closed" issues up, reopen them and begin working with them in their workflow, hopefully without affecting our historical Sprint Metrics. Then of course, that team would be able to close them again on their own board/workflow using their own "closed" state.
My question is - is possible to have two states of closed within a workflow?
An example of the states would be:
No, it won't work on the same board - there's an annoying design flaw that Atlassian won't fix that means you can't drag a card between status in the same column, and you can't use two columns because one of them would no longer be "done"
I would have board 1 for Team 1 include both status in the right-hand column, and then as Team 2 to use a separate board, which probably has one column for each status.
Badges are a great way to show off community activity, whether you’re a newbie or a Champion.Learn more
As part of the Bitbucket product team I'm always interested in better understanding what kind of impact the use of our tools have on the way you work. In a recent study we conducted of software devel...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs