cancel
Showing results for
Did you mean:
See all
See all
Groups
Explore all groups

Control Chart Analysis

Hi guys,

I'm trying to figure out the different time spend in each steps of our developement process;
I setup a board with 3 columns + done:

• UpStream (aka To Do)
• In Progress (aka in Progress)
• DownStream (aka in review / to be release / qa )
• Done (aka Closed)

I'm trying to segragated time Upstream, In Progress and Downstream, and while looking at the average values for each of them, I get figures :

• Upstream : 6 days, 16 hours, 1 minute
• In Progress : 15 days, 21 hours, 48 minutes
• Downstream : 16 days, 5 hours, 13 minutes

Sum = 38 days, 19 hours, 2 minutes

(don't worry about the actual lenght of those, I'm actually more looking at Epics than sprint tasks -:) )

When I select my 3 columns directly, I got average time

• Upstream + In Progress + Downstream : 42 days, 5 hours, 50 minutes

In my understanding, those 2 numbers should be exactly the same. I'm obviously using the same time frame and the same filters and swimlanes.

The same behaviour is reflected in the other metrics (standard deviation, running average....)

So my first question is :

Why are they not the same ? Where are those 4 days ?

My second question is about the "Done" column. There is stuff in there, mainly a few tasks that have been "repopened". Can I be certain that those tasks are nevertheless taken into account in the other columns ? Also, are they not introducing the issue above ?

Thanks;

Paul

1 accepted

Ruchi Tandon Atlassian Team Apr 14, 2013

Hey Paul,

I think I understand your questions here. I believe the difference in numbers is expected behavior. It is a matter of adding up individual averages and considering it same as cumulative average. This will not be the same because of the way cumulative averages are calculated.

Individual averages are calculated like this : (Time elapsed in stage A)/(number of issues that were in stage A)

Total of individual averages will look like : (Time elapsed in stage A)/(number of issues that were in stage A) + (Time elapsed in stage B)/(number of issues that were in stage B) + (Time elapsed in stage C)/(number of issues that were in stage C)

Cumulative averages (which shows up when you select all 3 stages A,B and C on 'Refine' tab) are calculated like this : (Time elapsed in stage A, B and C)/(number of issues that were in stage A, B and C)

As you can see, there is a huge difference in the way these numbers are calculated and hence it is quite normal that they don't total up to be the same, especially if not all issues didn't make it to all stages (A, B and C).

I hope that explanation helps a bit...

Hi Ruchi,

thanks for the feedback, it makes total sense. I'll check if this is effectively the way it's calculated, and I'll get back to you on this;
Cheers;
Paul

Community showcase
Asked Thursday in Jira Ops

I'm John Allspaw, Ask Me Anything about incident analysis and postmortems

I'm John Allspaw, co-founder of   Adaptive Capacity Labs, where we help teams use their incidents to learn and improve. We bring research-driven methods and approaches to drive effective inciden...

443 views 2 5

Atlassian User Groups

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find my local user group

Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs