Is it better to enable compression from Apach web server, or from Jira/Confluence?

This question is in reference to Atlassian Documentation: Compressing an HTTP Response within Confluence


I know there is a performance hit if we have compression enabled on Jira/Confluence and on Apache web server.  So the question is which one is better?  Is it better to enabled compression on Apache Web server (and therefore have compression on Jira/Confluene disabled), or the other way around (ie enabled compression on JIRA/Confluence and disable it on Apach Web serer)?


Thank you.

2 answers

in our case we disable compression on the Atlassian applications and open up a different port on the apache server for compression.  This way users can choose which one they want to use. 

We found that the internal corporate network was fast enough that using compression actually slowed down response time while users working remotely over a VPN and/or  slower networks saw major improvements using compression.

Do the compression at the apache level. Don't put too much on confluence, it's still java. Separate the machines in case you host them on the same host. Ensure the link between them is fast.

But: is the network usage so high ?  Is this really required?

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
Community showcase
Posted Oct 09, 2018 in Jira Core

How to manage many similar workflows?

I have multiple projects that use variations of the same base workflow. The variations depend on the requirements of the project or issue type. The variations mostly come in the form of new statuses ...

393 views 6 0
Join discussion

Atlassian User Groups

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find a group

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find my local user group

Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.

Start an AUG

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs

Groups near you