Is it possible to change the field scheme associated with "Epic" issue types without impacting the work of other groups that use epics? I would like to remove some of the extraneous fields that have been added for other teams in the global Epic issue type.
It was an example of how you might split it up. One group of projects might be development, and hence want development style epics and another group would be support with different needs. So you'd need different schemes for each group of project. They could all still be software project types, but with different schemes.
I have multiple projects that use variations of the same base workflow. The variations depend on the requirements of the project or issue type. The variations mostly come in the form of new statuses ...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs