Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
4,369,182
Community Members
 
Community Events
168
Community Groups

Crucible roles - confused and a bit frustrated

I want to use Crucible for reviewing code, but it seems that the roles are over complicated - for my small brain, anyway.

In my terminology, I want to allow a reviewer to review an author's changes.

For example if Bob submits some changes, I'd like me (James) to be able to initiate, perform, and summarize a review of Bob's code.

How can I set this up in Crucible? Currently I do the following:

  1. Create a review,
  2. Browse changelists for Bob's changes
  3. Select the changelists which I want to review
  4. Edit the review details - and here's where I run into problems.

I want to make Bob the author and me the Reviewer. However Crucible insists on having a moderator (which is set to me), and won't let me be reviewer and moderator.

If I try to remove the need for moderators from the project (under administration), then I get a message that a moderator must be set up under the default permission scheme.

So presumably I need to create a new permission scheme which allows me to not have a moderator.

Can anyone give me pointers as to how to achieve what I want here?

Thanks,

James

1 answer

You could set the author as the moderator, then you could be the reviewer.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS

Atlassian Community Events