I want to use Crucible for reviewing code, but it seems that the roles are over complicated - for my small brain, anyway.
In my terminology, I want to allow a reviewer to review an author's changes.
For example if Bob submits some changes, I'd like me (James) to be able to initiate, perform, and summarize a review of Bob's code.
How can I set this up in Crucible? Currently I do the following:
I want to make Bob the author and me the Reviewer. However Crucible insists on having a moderator (which is set to me), and won't let me be reviewer and moderator.
If I try to remove the need for moderators from the project (under administration), then I get a message that a moderator must be set up under the default permission scheme.
So presumably I need to create a new permission scheme which allows me to not have a moderator.
Can anyone give me pointers as to how to achieve what I want here?
I’m a designer on the Jira team. For a long time, I’ve fielded questions from other designers about how they should be using Jira Software with their design team. I’ve also heard feedback from other ...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs