It's not the same without you
Join the community to find out what other Atlassian users are discussing, debating and creating.
Is there any downside to having the attachment storage be in the db as opposed to the file system. As far as backup/restore and refreshing our test instance just having it all in the db would make those processes much easier, but if there are performance hits I wouldn't necessarily want to do that.
FYI, our install is on Windows Server and MSSQL.
The main downside is that attachments can grow rapidly and your DBAs may not be too happy with it.
However, on top of that, I wouldn't do it now - database storage of attachments was deprecated in Confluence 5.5
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok. Looks like database storage is deprecated. So, nevermind.
https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Attachment+Storage+Configuration
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi team, I’m Avinoam, a product manager on Confluence Cloud, and today I’m really excited to let the Community know that all customers can now try out the new editing experience and see some of the ...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Find a groupConnect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.
Start an AUGYou're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.