This pull request has conflicts.
You must resolve the conflicts by manually merging this branch into test. This will merge the pull request remotely.
Step 1: Checkout the target branch and merge in the changes from the source branch. Resolve conflicts.
git checkout test git pull origin feature/BRANCH-some-process
Step 2: After the merge conflicts are resolved, stage the changes accordingly, commit the changes and push.
git commit git push origin HEAD
Step 3: The pull request will be updated and marked as merged.
@koganm, Did you get an answer? We would like to change that "more information" page too. It causes harm in our situation because developers push into a synched branch in their fork.
We would like to be able to provide different instructions or a link to a Confluence page with instructions.
EDIT: This issue has been reported: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/BSERV-8480
Hi, I just registered to tell you I am experiencing the same "issue" at work, although it solved itself. We usually resolve conflicts by pulling the destination branch into the source branch. However, we also got this error for one merge conflict which proposed the other way around (effectively merging manually).
What shocked me that googling the mesage for exact matches only returns this very page: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22You+must+resolve+the+conflicts+by+manually+merging+this+branch+into%22
So, is there any reason why Bitbucket proposes 99% of the times to do a dest->source merge (so we can merge with the button in the PR), but now it proposes the other way around?
@koganm have you tried to merge dest->source and see if that resolved the issue (instead of following the steps to merge source->dest)?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.