We have a git private repository, I have defined a group, who's members can access this repository.
Within git, there are no rules about defining who you are. You can make up an email or username but, when you push, a change, you have to be a credentialed bitbucket user.
My question is, if someone has a generic name like root or admin when they check-in code, is there any way to determine the credentialed bit bucket user associated with that push? I have looked long and hard and cannot find a solution on the web.
I do not think you can map OS-level usernames to Bitbucket usernames using some configurable mapping. And even if it was possible, I think this would not be a very good practice, as another level of abstraction may complicate your life.
Why don't you force using the Bitbucket username as Git committer name?
(You could even use the Commit Policy for Bitbucket app to enforce this.)
Hello! My name is Mark Askew and I am a Premier Support Engineer for products Bitbucket Server/Data Center, Fisheye & Crucible. Today, I want to bring the discussion that Jennifer, Matt, and ...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs