Hi Team,
I have merged a branch back into master as part of the pull request and I am not able to see the commit when I am visiting the commit history of the master.
Now, is this an expected behavior?
Warm Regards,
-Jewel
It doesn't sound expected. Can you post some screenshots?
The only way to loose commits is to:
----O----*----*----/M----* <-- HEAD \ / \--.----.--/--x <-- deleted branch
the x commit will be lost (but you need to force the deletion, as git complains). Are you sure this isn't the case?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No, I am pretty sure that is not the case. The changes happened during the merge of the pull request is not coming here. That's the problem.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Then, IDNK. git fsck, git reflog, etc
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.