i am wondering, if the capacity of team members is supposed to sync over plans.
My scenario: I have three plans in which multiple projects are grouped. All plans share the same company teams but are planned independently.
That is the reason why we chose to divide the projects into three separate plans.
When i now assign for example 100h to employee1 on projectX in PlanA and 150h to the same employee in projectY in PlanA his capacity of course shows 250h which are planned sequently.
When i then switch to PlanB, this employee's capacity is completely free. The already assigned 250h are not taken into account. When i assign another 300h on projectZ in PlanB to this employee it is planned in the same weeks as the house from PlanA.
I would expect his workload to sum up to 550h and the work to be scheduled sequently according to this employee's team availability.
Do i mess up the way this is supposed to behave? What is the point of shared teams if the workload is not summed up over all plans?
And by the way: Is there a way to show all tickets that are assigned to a user and when are scheduled?
Hi community, I’m Roi, a product manager working on Advanced Roadmaps for Jira. While Advanced Roadmaps is a powerful tool to plan and track work at scale, we know it can be challenging to get star...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find an event
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.Host an event
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events