Does the Linked Issues field work on ScriptRunner for JIRA?

[Pablo Culebras]

I recently tried to detect changes to the Linked Issues field, even if the listener is added:

Chrome's console log entry:

[SR Behaviours] field: issuelinks

The problem is that apparently the fields have different IDs to that one issuelinks-linktype and issuelinks-issues. Because of this, none of the changes trigger the Behaviour script.

Behaviour setup:

- Field enabled: 
      Linked Issues
- Conditions:
      None
- Script:
      // log a change in the field
      log.error getFieldById(getFieldChanged())

As a result, no matter how many times I change the field, I get no entries in my log.

Is this a bug or am I using the field in the wrong way?

[Daniel Yelamos [Adaptavist]]

Buenas Pablo.

Could you kindly provide your code for your behaviour and or a screenshot of the configuration?

Cheers!

DYelamos

[Pablo Culebras]

Here you may see the config:

Here the results:

[Joshua Yamdogo [Adaptavist]]

This could also be related to https://productsupport.adaptavist.com/browse/SRJIRA-1316 if they are on an older version of SR.

[Pablo Culebras]

Good evening Joshua,

I am running the latest version of SR and the bug still exists.

Can you please check?

[Joshua Yamdogo [Adaptavist]]

Pablo,

I am not able to reproduce the bug. I just added a behaviour to the "Linked Issues" field, added a server-side script that has a logging statement, and started changing the Linked Issues field on the create screen. As expected, I get this in the logs:

2017-12-04 15:14:58,950 http-bio-8080-exec-11 DEBUG admin [jira.groovy.user.FieldBehaviours] Field changed
2017-12-04 15:15:06,745 http-bio-8080-exec-11 DEBUG admin [jira.groovy.user.FieldBehaviours] Field changed
2017-12-04 15:15:08,408 http-bio-8080-exec-11 DEBUG admin [jira.groovy.user.FieldBehaviours] Field changed

I am running ScriptRunner for Jira Server, version 5.2.3. Jira version 7.6.0. 

[Pablo Culebras]

I am running the same version (correction: Script Runner is using the latest version available in the marketplace 5.2.2) as well.

The only difference is that I added a new link type named includes/is included in.

Can you check with such a config please?

[Joshua Yamdogo [Adaptavist]]

In which way are you testing the behaviour? Unless you are linking an issue on the Create, Edit, or transition screen, the behaviour won't work because behaviours don't work on the View screen. If you are just looking at an issue and clicking the + button in the Linked Issues section to add an issue, the behaviour won't work.

It looks like in your screenshot you are doing it on the right screen, but I just want to check.

[Pablo Culebras]

From the create screen.

I am running Jira from in a Docker container from this image.

This is what I detected by playing with the browser console:

- It seems that posting runvalid method does not trigger for the field Linked Issues, whereas it does for any other (not binded correctly on startup?).

If I manually edit and send the POST request to the runvalidator.json endpoint, the change is captured by the serverside script and it generates a log entry.

P.S.: I am not using any Ad-blocker add-ons.

[Pablo Culebras]

Any ideas?

[Guy Anela]

Hi Pablo - We're experiencing the same thing. Were you able to get any further on this?

[Pablo Culebras]

Hi Guy,

Sadly I didn't hear back from Adaptavist anymore and there was nothing I could do, so I stopped looking in this direction.

[Guy Anela]

Bummer. ...thanks for responding. :)

[Jake Choules [Adaptavist]]

Hi Pablo, Guy,

Apologies that it's taken a while for us to get back to you.

I've had a go at reproducing the issue on our latest internal build and the problem does not seem to occur: the log entries are produced as expected. On the other hand, I was able to achieve a reproduction on the latest public release (5.2.2). I believe therefore that this issue should be fixed in the next release. I'm afraid I can't give a concrete date for when this release will occur but hopefully it will be soon.

Hope the above info is helpful, and sorry again for the long silence!

J